8050B
speaker
$1,795
Gebrauchtmarkt: $1,290*
Technische Daten
3 von 4 Werten mit vermerkter QuelleKommentar des Toningenieurs
Headroom Notes
205 mm woofer, 150 W plus 120 W of class AB. The per-speaker short-term maximum is ≥110 dB SPL at 1 m in half space; the ≥120 dB on the same page is the pair. The 10 kΩ balanced input is a normal load for any line output, so the question with this monitor is the room, not the source.
Was im Datenblatt tatsächlich steht
Wörtlich von der Herstellerseite zitiert, mit dem Datum der Prüfung. Wir behaupten das Gedruckte, nicht die Absicht dahinter.
«Peak SPL ≥120 dB — Maximum peak acoustic output per pair at 1 m distance with music material.»
Genelec's headline peak figure is measured for two speakers playing together, and the row says so. Two coherent sources add up to about 6 dB over one, but how much of that you actually get depends on their spacing and on the listening position, so the number cannot be converted to a per-speaker figure afterwards. The same table's short-term row is the per-speaker, on-axis, half-space number, and that is the one that can be lined up against another maker's per-speaker figure. On the 8010A the same row also names a placement — «on top of console» — which adds boundary gain on top of the pair coupling.
geprüft am 5.8.2026«The largest model the 8050A features an 8 inch bass driver and 1inch tweeter. The free field frequency response is 35Hz to 21 kHz. Peak SPL is 120dB and bass and treble amplification is 150 and 120 watts respectively.»
In one block of text on the 8050B page, Genelec describes the 8030A and 8040A with the words «Peak SPL per pair is 108dB» and «Peak SPL per pair is 115dB», and then the 8050A with «Peak SPL is 120dB» — the qualifier «per pair» dropped from the third sentence of the same paragraph series. The specification table further down the same page restores it: «Maximum peak acoustic output per pair at 1 m distance with music material». Read on its own, the prose sentence states a per-speaker capability that the table does not claim.
geprüft am 5.8.2026* Geschätzt über das Abschreibungsmodell (~72% Restwert). · geprüft am 5.8.2026